Attempted Sodomy with Sneakers at Dean College

So, without further ado, here is the video that prompted me to wag my finger today.

Now, did that entertain you?
It drove me rather concerned for the state of manners todays youth is engaged in.

Now, a short but simple analysis:
Guy 1, in the olive green, just walks along the way, minding his own business, when the other guys start mumbling something about "Who want da war, n****r, who want da waar?"
Please excuse my lack of tact, but I strongly feel that it is vital to understand the complicated process of courtship of said individual. 

Rather curious incident, as a non native englis speaker, it reminded me of something I saw on youtube once.

Must be a coincidence then, but I strongly suspect a correlation between the two.

Now, this is where it gets hot and heavy.

Guy 2 shows up, styled as what the media has taught me is a "Guido" , a slangterm for italian looking overly tanned muscular guys, who are either members of Jersy Shore, or flamboyant homosexuals.
Guy 2 steps up into the field of comfort of Guy 1, and tells him, "Who'se your man". I will repeat that for those of you not fluent in english, who is your man. So, there, an introduction has been made.

A theory arises that guy 2 finds guy 1 quite attractive, and the prison custom of wearing your pants down to indicate that you are homosexual and looking for a partner for some sodomy comes to mind, but the validity can be not tested, as said individuals appear to lack a rather disturbing amount of refinement.
Apparently, poor guy 2 is rather colorblind, as he repeatedly refers to guy 1 as a "n****r", while shoving him away, and asking him who his man is.


At this point, my mind is trying to comprehends what is happening there.
Guy 2, having disregarded all manner and ettiquette  in regards to courting, repeatedly gropes a feel of guy 1, yet proceeds to shove him away. Rather inefficient, I say.


Then, as guy 1 coily proceeds to touch the wrist of guy 2, he at once asserts the situation correctly, and refuses to be calmed down. He must know who his "man" is, because, and at this point we can safely guess that he simply must know if guy 1 is currently "seeing" anybody.


Then, guy number 2 seems intimidated by his lack of articulation, and in the same manner as a boy might pull the pigtails of the girl he fancies, proceeds to slap guy 1 with sufficent force to knock him to the ground.


Proceeding to beat his head, guy number 2 does not stop unless he has acess to guy 1 's shoes, which he promptly removes.


Slapping guy 1 a last time with the removed shoes, guy 2 makes off with them, only to be greeted by a chorus of encouraging cheers from his mates, as they seem to share his enthusiasm for male footwear. Left6 behind is a rather hurt looking guy 1, who stumbles around, looking for a way to grasp what has happened.


It must hurt, that while not accepting his offer for courtship, all that guy 2 ever wanted from him was his shoes, to engage in vile acts of sodomy.


Now, there are three points I must adress first.

1. Just because you are a rather muscular welltanned man who apparently fancies scrawny white males does not excuse your lack of taste. Rather then saying "Who is your man", givinbg the poor bloke the impression that you would consider a relationship, simply ask, straight foreward: "May I aquire your shoes for excessive communal sodomy with me and my friends?"
The poor white man is now rather depressed, and hopefully does not do  anything drastic, while you have his shoes for whatever purposes imaginable. If you are honest with people, they surely will appreciate the effort, and be honest with you, like telling you that the shirt did tend to show of the fact that you seemed to have aquired breasts, possibly due to cupious ammounts of self tanning and steroid intake.
2. Please, if you want to be understood, surround yourself with less loud friends. it makes it less likely that you will be actually understood, or that you could get the help you need.
3. Even if it pains me to actually adress this, please take note. said guy 1 was white, and for all purposes, appeared caucasian, and tried his best to fit in. So, you classifying him as a "N****r" was either rather inappropriate, as in that case, the correct terminology would be "C*****r", signifying his caucasian skin, or in regards to your proximity, displayed a disturbing lack of vision.
In both cases, I would suggest getting prescription glasses for recognising the race of your conversation partner.

Or, to put it in the words your generation might understand: