Geraldo Rivera: Please, don't lecture us about dresscode.

Yes. You might have been a hotshot of sorts back in the day.
But apparently, you got stuck there.

To tell you the truth, you are past your prime, and know it. However, you try to give others advice on clothing.

Now, I applaud your choice to say that George Zimmermann “should be investigated to the fullest extent of the law and if he is criminally liable, he should be prosecuted.”
For a fellow white man, you are at least smart in your choice of words.

But the choice of words? Pardon my french, but that was a shame.
First of all, you quite possibly know that you are still sexy, compared to the other candidates out there, and you use it to your full extend. 

Yes. You know you used to be able to pull it off, and you have a dashing smile.
BUT, compare you acting youthfull, energetic, and street to this:

Now, that is what you are supposed to look like, decent, non hoodie wearing, and old and distinguished.

That being said, lets examine a bit closer what you said.

“I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin’s death as George Zimmerman was,” Rivera explained. (source: TPM Muckraker )

No. Simply said, at thgis point, all of my sympathies due to your good looks and dashing smile are gone.
The hoodie is a choice of clothing. George Zimmermann is a murderer and still runs free.

The same point can be made when a girl gets raped, that the choice of clothing was at least as guilty as the rapist.
No. I can stand female members of society, dressed in enough tissue to make a hankey, and not lay hands upon them. (Although I can't help lopoking, but my shades usually hide that)
The reason that most older people demand that girls somehow "dress decent" is the rationing that somehow, males are less able to controll themself in the presence of a nude female.
Now, I must offer a different rationale. The female in my example has done nothing other then dress more lightly then usual. The FULL blame lies with the male attacker. In that light, the male should be the ONLY one suffering the punishment.

The same goes for George Zimmermann.
If an African American Kid in a Hoodie scares a grown man that much that he has to shoot him, then the man has a serious problem.

But, lets continue.

"“What’s the instant association? It’s crime scene surveillance tapes. Every time you see someone stick up a 7-11, the kid is wearing a hoodie. Every time you see a mugging on a surveillance camera or get the old lady in the alcove, it’s kid with a hoodie,” Rivera continued." (source: TMP Muckraker )

So, according to you, because people see crime scene surveillance tapes, they tend to be more afraid.
Now, that leaves the question, how do you aquire said tapes?
The answer is relatively easy. Watch enough fox news, and you are bound to see crime scene surveillance tapes. That means, in your own words, that if the fact that george Zimmermann being scared because of the hoodies is partially responsible for the slaying of unarmed Trayvon Martin, it means that the source of that Paranoia, FOX News, and other newscasts who habitually show crime scene surveillance tapes, are at least AS guilty as the hoodie.

I could not agree more.

"“When you see a Black or Latino youngster, particularly on the street, you walk to the other side of the street. You try to avoid that confrontation,” he said. “Trayvon Martin, god bless him, an innocent kid, a wonderful kid, a box of Skittles in his hands. He didn’t deserve to die. But I bet you money, if he didn’t have that hoodie on that, nutty neighborhood watch guy wouldn’t have responded in that violent and aggressive way.”
The hoodie, Riveara said, cannot be rehabilitated.
“Stop wearing it! You know the old Johnny Cash song, don’t take your gun to town, son. Leave your gun at home,” Rivera said. “There is some things that are almost inevitable. I’m not suggesting that Trayvon Martin had any kind of weapon, but he wore an outfit that allowed someone to respond in this irrational, overzealous way and if he had been dressed more appropriately… I think unless it’s raining out, or if you’re at a track meet, leave the hoodie home, don’t let your children go out there.”" (source: TMP Muckraker )

Just... stop.
If I see a Latino or  Black youngster, I do nodd to him, and keep my way. I also do not avoid confrontation.
Also, knowing the songs of Johnny cash, it is not likely that he meant Hoodies. I only see reference to "guns", which indicates to me pretty clearly that he meant guns like the one George Zimmermann was wearing.

I do know that you will possibly not understand it, but not all people have a dresser full of suits.
Especially when it is raining, like the day when George Zimmermann shot the kid.

Now, I know you can't be as open as you would liker, and as I am the best example, english is a difficultr language.
So, in total, please, try to be silent, look dashing and handsome, and open Al Capones vault an other time for us.

Also, you looked a LOT like Ron Burgundy in your younger days, you know that?

Stay classy, silent, and dashingly handsome.

Delitzsch, Saxony, officially supports Neo-Nazis

Most people, like me, would have had no clue where Delitzsch would be, or why it was important.

Now, like most citys in Saxony, there is a Nazi Problem. Most people do not know this, but Saxony is known for harboring a disturbing ammount of Neo Nazis, and being generally as inviting to foreigners as rednecks are to city folk.

But this week, they had taken the cake.

See, there happens to be some unfortunate construct called " National Befreite Zonen", zones in Germany that would qualify as " currently being occupied by fascist terrorists". Delitzsch is one of these.
In one of these zones, you have something like an inofficial presence of these neo Nazis, officially and inofficially supported by the local police and gouvernment, and you are less likely to find foreigners, anti fascists, and the lot.

Now, it gets interesting:
You have in that city a concert of a few ska bands, and a DJ. In my personal opinion, it is some kind of music, and while I do not happen to enjoy it, I do realise it is there.

A few known Neo Nazis did not think that way.
They went to the party, drove up, and openly attacked the person who organised this concert, his girlfriend, and two friends. Apparently, that was a mistake, as they used self defence in a most interesting way, beat back the attack, and put one of the Neo Nazis in the hospital. This bloke is said to likely loose one of his eyes as a result of the injuries.

Now, you would think the community would congratulate the man for standing his ground, and defending what he stands for. But far from it.

Last Thursday, he was invited to city hall, where the officials made a very interestingt order, for restoring public peace.
He was prohibited from holding concerts where neo nazi Attendance was not allowed. Also, they told him that if there was no counter culture directed towards the neo nazi scene, there would be no violence emerging.

Also, for a demonstration against this percieved injustice, there is a cataloge of demands from the city that is aimed at preventing the demonstration, in the interest of "maintaining the public peace"

Now, I see three possibilitys why that is happening, which of course is just my personal opinion.
1. The Officials in Delitzsch are actually unaware of the growing situation in Germany, where the NPD, the nationalistic party of germany, is about to be outlawed as a terrorist organisation, where the NSU, the national socialist underground, is growing terror cells with the aid of the german "Verfassungsschutz", an intelligence service for the protection of the constitution, and about the growing theories of extremism, or "Extremismustheorien", where the fascist forces and the leftist forces who are usually fighting the neo nazis are put on the same position. Then, there is only one solution for that. Get the entire city together,  and read the newspapers.

2. The police are aware that there is a neo nazi problem ( according to german blogs, at least during the 20 year reign of the local CDU, there have been reports of a stroing neo nazi presence in the area), bvut they think it will go away if they are not provoked.
Then, I only offer my condolonces to the elected officials, and hope that they remain in office long enough to see the fruits of their labour.

3. The officials of the city are actually aware of the problem, but decide to not provoke the nazis, either out of fear, or out of admiration. For the first case, take a look at your current behaviour. you are catering to a terrorist organisation out of fear that they might do something. If that is the case, please, come to your senses. Get the police, traiuned attack weasels, and hound these browns out of town.
Or, if you admire them, well, buy the ticket take the ride. Don't come crying if it does not turn out like you wanted it to.

My wishes are with all of the peacefull people in town, who see themself between the fronts of the lefts and the rights. Stand your ground, watch, remain peacefull, and think really carefully about what you will do next election time.

Your vote is the mightiest weapüon of all.

And in the sense of gentlemanly behaviour:
Stand your ground, and wear stable shoes. And if you are a foreigner, researchj No-Go Zones. I would strongly advise to make Delitzsch one.

Attempted Sodomy with Sneakers at Dean College

So, without further ado, here is the video that prompted me to wag my finger today.

Now, did that entertain you?
It drove me rather concerned for the state of manners todays youth is engaged in.

Now, a short but simple analysis:
Guy 1, in the olive green, just walks along the way, minding his own business, when the other guys start mumbling something about "Who want da war, n****r, who want da waar?"
Please excuse my lack of tact, but I strongly feel that it is vital to understand the complicated process of courtship of said individual. 

Rather curious incident, as a non native englis speaker, it reminded me of something I saw on youtube once.

Must be a coincidence then, but I strongly suspect a correlation between the two.

Now, this is where it gets hot and heavy.

Guy 2 shows up, styled as what the media has taught me is a "Guido" , a slangterm for italian looking overly tanned muscular guys, who are either members of Jersy Shore, or flamboyant homosexuals.
Guy 2 steps up into the field of comfort of Guy 1, and tells him, "Who'se your man". I will repeat that for those of you not fluent in english, who is your man. So, there, an introduction has been made.

A theory arises that guy 2 finds guy 1 quite attractive, and the prison custom of wearing your pants down to indicate that you are homosexual and looking for a partner for some sodomy comes to mind, but the validity can be not tested, as said individuals appear to lack a rather disturbing amount of refinement.
Apparently, poor guy 2 is rather colorblind, as he repeatedly refers to guy 1 as a "n****r", while shoving him away, and asking him who his man is.


At this point, my mind is trying to comprehends what is happening there.
Guy 2, having disregarded all manner and ettiquette  in regards to courting, repeatedly gropes a feel of guy 1, yet proceeds to shove him away. Rather inefficient, I say.


Then, as guy 1 coily proceeds to touch the wrist of guy 2, he at once asserts the situation correctly, and refuses to be calmed down. He must know who his "man" is, because, and at this point we can safely guess that he simply must know if guy 1 is currently "seeing" anybody.


Then, guy number 2 seems intimidated by his lack of articulation, and in the same manner as a boy might pull the pigtails of the girl he fancies, proceeds to slap guy 1 with sufficent force to knock him to the ground.


Proceeding to beat his head, guy number 2 does not stop unless he has acess to guy 1 's shoes, which he promptly removes.


Slapping guy 1 a last time with the removed shoes, guy 2 makes off with them, only to be greeted by a chorus of encouraging cheers from his mates, as they seem to share his enthusiasm for male footwear. Left6 behind is a rather hurt looking guy 1, who stumbles around, looking for a way to grasp what has happened.


It must hurt, that while not accepting his offer for courtship, all that guy 2 ever wanted from him was his shoes, to engage in vile acts of sodomy.


Now, there are three points I must adress first.

1. Just because you are a rather muscular welltanned man who apparently fancies scrawny white males does not excuse your lack of taste. Rather then saying "Who is your man", givinbg the poor bloke the impression that you would consider a relationship, simply ask, straight foreward: "May I aquire your shoes for excessive communal sodomy with me and my friends?"
The poor white man is now rather depressed, and hopefully does not do  anything drastic, while you have his shoes for whatever purposes imaginable. If you are honest with people, they surely will appreciate the effort, and be honest with you, like telling you that the shirt did tend to show of the fact that you seemed to have aquired breasts, possibly due to cupious ammounts of self tanning and steroid intake.
2. Please, if you want to be understood, surround yourself with less loud friends. it makes it less likely that you will be actually understood, or that you could get the help you need.
3. Even if it pains me to actually adress this, please take note. said guy 1 was white, and for all purposes, appeared caucasian, and tried his best to fit in. So, you classifying him as a "N****r" was either rather inappropriate, as in that case, the correct terminology would be "C*****r", signifying his caucasian skin, or in regards to your proximity, displayed a disturbing lack of vision.
In both cases, I would suggest getting prescription glasses for recognising the race of your conversation partner.

Or, to put it in the words your generation might understand: